307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12102143)
1. Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
Lavie T; Sturmey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 12102143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments.
Weldy CR; Rapp JT; Capocasa K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):214-8. PubMed ID: 24452818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
Carr JE; Nicolson AC; Higbee TS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of computer based instruction to behavior skills training for teaching staff implementation of discrete-trial instruction with an adult with autism.
Nosik MR; Williams WL; Garrido N; Lee S
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):461-8. PubMed ID: 23041660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing and training teachers in the generalized use of behavior modification with autistic children.
Koegel RL; Russo DC; Rincover A
J Appl Behav Anal; 1977; 10(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 885826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing generalized behavior-modification skills in high-school students working with retarded children.
Gladstone BW; Sherman JA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 1184486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a self-instructional manual for conducting discrete-trials teaching with children with autism.
Thiessen C; Fazzio D; Arnal L; Martin GL; Yu CT; Keilback L
Behav Modif; 2009 May; 33(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 19139527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
Gottschalk JM; Libby ME; Graff RB
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10738955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments.
Rosales R; Gongola L; Homlitas C
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 25927112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional analysis of erratic body movement maintained by visual stimulation. Incorporating conjugate reinforcement into a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
Rapp JT; Dozier CL; Carr JE; Patel MR; Enloe KA
Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 14710709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Say Cheese": teaching photography skills to adults with developmental disabilities.
Edrisinha C; O'Reilly MF; Choi HY; Sigafoos J; Lancioni GE
Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):636-42. PubMed ID: 21227636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children.
Mosk MD; Bucher B
J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 6725167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Teaching children with autism to ask questions about hidden objects.
Williams G; Donley CR; Keller JW
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):627-30. PubMed ID: 11214038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of training in management of child behavior for dental hygiene students.
Ishikawa T; Kuwahara S; Nagasaka N
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 9466017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping and maintaining behavior modification skills in staff members in an MR institution: Columbus State Institute behavior modification program.
Watson LS; Gardner JM; Sanders C
Ment Retard; 1971 Jun; 9(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 5558461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
