These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12102408)

  • 1. Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies.
    Swennen G; Dempf R; Schliephake H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 12102408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: clinical studies.
    Swennen G; Schliephake H; Dempf R; Schierle H; Malevez C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 30(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 11405458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillo-facial bones].
    Scopelliti D; Orsini R; Ventucci E; Verdino G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2000; 49(7-8):355-68. PubMed ID: 11234688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis: maxillary and mandibular lengthening.
    Guerrero CA; Bell WH; Meza LS
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):111-51. PubMed ID: 11905328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical and orthodontic considerations for distraction osteogenesis with ROD appliances.
    Dessner S; Razdolsky Y; el-Bialy T
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):111-39. PubMed ID: 11905335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Maxillofacial surgery and distraction osteogenesis--history, present, perspective].
    Dzhorov A; Dzhorova I
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2003; 59(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 15641559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
    Cho BC; Chung HY; Lee DG; Yang JD; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Lee DS; Kwon IC; Bae EH; Jang KH; Park RW; Kim IS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1753-64. PubMed ID: 16297697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for measuring and monitoring monobloc distraction osteogenesis using three-dimensional computed tomography rendered images with the "biporion-dorsum sellae" plane. Part II: comparison of measurements before and after distraction.
    Salyer KE; Por YC; Genecov DG; Barcelo CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 18362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Distraction osteogenesis and orofacial anomalies].
    Jansma J; Becking AG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Jun; 115(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 18618986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a rabbit model using a novel experimental design.
    Al-Sebaei MO; Gagari E; Papageorge M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):664-72. PubMed ID: 15883942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental model for bone regeneration in oral and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery.
    Mardas N; Dereka X; Donos N; Dard M
    J Invest Surg; 2014 Feb; 27(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 23957784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
    Hasse AR; Pörksen M; Zimmermann CE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new semiburied curvilinear distraction device in dogs.
    Niu XG; Han XX
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 17646039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability, adaptation and growth following distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial region.
    Peltomäki T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Aug; 12(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 19627520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Submental intubation: surgical and anesthesiological aspects].
    Koudstaal MJ; van der Wal KG; Mallios C; Rupreht J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12645353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of platelet-rich-plasma on cranial distraction osteogenesis in sheep: preliminary clinical and radiographic results.
    Swennen GR; Schutyser F; Mueller MC; Kramer FJ; Eulzer C; Schliephake H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 34(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 15741039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16154316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery.
    Meyer U; Kleinheinz J; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):140-9. PubMed ID: 15113571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of oil-based calcium hydroxide (Osteoinductal) on distraction osteogenesis in rabbit mandible.
    Polat HB; Yeler H; Gumus C; Bulut HE; Kucuk D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):e30-6. PubMed ID: 19464640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-level laser effect on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Miloro M; Miller JJ; Stoner JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 65(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 17236917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.