These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12105732)

  • 1. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
    Wang J; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
    Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
    Groth DS; Bernatz SN; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(3):719-32. PubMed ID: 11353118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
    Wang J; Compton K; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 12964056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Imaging monitors--requirements and pitfalls].
    Simmler R
    Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1020-2. PubMed ID: 24068292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.
    Wang J; Langer S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):158-68. PubMed ID: 9399169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors.
    Parr LF; Anderson AL; Glennon BK; Fetherston P
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11442103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
    Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS system.
    Crespi A; Bonsignore F; Paruccini N; Macchi I
    Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):863-75. PubMed ID: 16896553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.
    Siegel EL; Reiner BI; Cadogan M
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Aug; 13(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 15359749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
    Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.
    Roehrig H; Willis CE; Damento MA
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):152-65. PubMed ID: 10587910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.
    Parsons DM; Kim Y; Haynor DR
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 7734525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicolegal--malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Must all monitors meet DICOM standards?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W492. PubMed ID: 25794101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of primary diagnostic monitors (PDMs) over time.
    Ruuge AE; Gao Y; Erdi YE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):180-185. PubMed ID: 31833641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.
    McIlgorm DJ; McNulty JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140148. PubMed ID: 25421807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.