These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12105760)

  • 41. Sustainable management for the eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey.
    Berberoglu S
    Environ Manage; 2003 Mar; 31(3):442-51. PubMed ID: 12592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Land desertification monitoring and assessment in Yulin of Northwest China using remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS).
    Zhang Y; Chen Z; Zhu B; Luo X; Guan Y; Guo S; Nie Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Dec; 147(1-3):327-37. PubMed ID: 18197462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of land suitability for the siting of inter-municipal landfills in the Cuitzeo Lake Basin, Mexico.
    Delgado OB; Mendoza M; Granados EL; Geneletti D
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1137-46. PubMed ID: 17869499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Land use change analysis of Beykoz-Istanbul by means of satellite images and GIS.
    Musaoglu N; Coskun M; Kocabas V
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(11):245-51. PubMed ID: 16114639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Population, food situation and problems of agricultural development in Andhra Pradesh.
    Surendra S
    IIPS Newsl; 1991 Jan; 32(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 12343420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predicting land cover using GIS, Bayesian and evolutionary algorithm methods.
    Aitkenhead MJ; Aalders IH
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):236-50. PubMed ID: 18079039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Community/campus partnership: tailoring geographic information systems for perinatal health planning.
    Caley LM; Shiode N; Shelton JA
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2008; 2(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20208188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Demarcating coastal vegetation buffers with multicriteria evaluation and GIS at Saldanha Bay, South Africa.
    van der Merwe JH; Lohrentz G
    Ambio; 2001 Mar; 30(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 11374311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Determinants of deforestation in Nepal's Central Development Region.
    Bhattarai K; Conway D; Yousef M
    J Environ Manage; 2009; 91(2):471-88. PubMed ID: 19822389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The worth of land use: a GIS-emergy evaluation of natural and human-made capital.
    Mellino S; Buonocore E; Ulgiati S
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 506-507():137-48. PubMed ID: 25460948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Environmental management framework for wind farm siting: methodology and case study.
    Tegou LI; Polatidis H; Haralambopoulos DA
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 91(11):2134-47. PubMed ID: 20541310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Landscape characterization integrating expert and local spatial knowledge of land and forest resources.
    Fagerholm N; Käyhkö N; Van Eetvelde V
    Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 52(3):660-82. PubMed ID: 23934059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Framing community forestry challenges with a broader lens: case studies from the Brazilian Amazon.
    Hajjar R; McGrath DG; Kozak RA; Innes JL
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2159-69. PubMed ID: 21550165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reorienting systematic conservation assessment for effective conservation planning.
    Sewall BJ; Freestone AL; Moutui MF; Toilibou N; Saïd I; Toumani SM; Attoumane D; Iboura CM
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 21771077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A geographic information system approach to evaluating the effects of the endangered species protection program on mosquito control.
    Spradling SL; Olson JK; Coulson RN; Lovelady CN
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 9673913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning.
    Lechner AM; Raymond CM; Adams VM; Polyakov M; Gordon A; Rhodes JR; Mills M; Stein A; Ives CD; Lefroy EC
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1497-511. PubMed ID: 25382071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj).
    Moeinaddini M; Khorasani N; Danehkar A; Darvishsefat AA; Zienalyan M
    Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):912-20. PubMed ID: 20138748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integrating geo-referenced multiscale and multidisciplinary data for the management of biodiversity in livestock genetic resources.
    Joost S; Colli L; Baret PV; Garcia JF; Boettcher PJ; Tixier-Boichard M; Ajmone-Marsan P;
    Anim Genet; 2010 May; 41 Suppl 1():47-63. PubMed ID: 20500755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.