These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1210755)

  • 1. [A study of the phases of audiovisual interaction].
    Bagdonas A; Shiautkulis A
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1975; 25(5):908-15. PubMed ID: 1210755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS; Möttönen R; Sams M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaction time and the psychological refractory period in children and adults.
    Surwillo WW; Titus TG
    Dev Psychobiol; 1976 Nov; 9(6):517-27. PubMed ID: 1001837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal order judgments for audiovisual targets embedded in unimodal and bimodal distractor streams.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.
    Bernstein IH; Chu PK; Briggs P; Schurman DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 4515814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependence of recognition time of meaningful photic stimuli on spatiotemporal organization of brain potentials.
    Potulova LA; Vasil'ev YaA
    Hum Physiol; 1983; 9(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 6678789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relationship between recognition asymmetry and the interval between the stimuli of a dichoptic complex].
    Bagdonas A; Kochiunene N
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(4):838-46. PubMed ID: 919771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG alpha slowing, refractory period, and reaction time in aging.
    Woodruff DS; Kramer DA
    Exp Aging Res; 1979 Aug; 5(4):279-92. PubMed ID: 520385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task.
    Peiffer AM; Mozolic JL; Hugenschmidt CE; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17558300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.
    Colonius H; Diederich A; Steenken R
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):177-84. PubMed ID: 19337824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression: commonalities and dissociations.
    Oranje B; Geyer MA; Bocker KB; Leon Kenemans J; Verbaten MN
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Aug; 143(2-3):147-58. PubMed ID: 16879870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [llocalization of grouping effect in overlapping tasks].
    Sommer W; Leuthold H; Abdel-Rahman R; Pfütze EM
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 9498917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.