147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12108074)
1. [Single nasal prong versus infant flow driver in very low birth weight infants: clinical efficacy of two modes of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)].
Gulczyńska E; Zjawiona A; Sobolewska B; Gadzinowski J
Przegl Lek; 2002; 59 Suppl 1():54-6. PubMed ID: 12108074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams.
Khorana M; Paradeevisut H; Sangtawesin V; Kanjanapatanakul W; Chotigeat U; Ayutthaya JK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S136-42. PubMed ID: 19253509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
Gupta S; Sinha SK; Tin W; Donn SM
J Pediatr; 2009 May; 154(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 19230906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants.
Campbell DM; Shah PS; Shah V; Kelly EN
J Perinatol; 2006 Sep; 26(9):546-9. PubMed ID: 16837929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants.
Pantalitschka T; Sievers J; Urschitz MS; Herberts T; Reher C; Poets CF
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2009 Jul; 94(4):F245-8. PubMed ID: 19131432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Aly H; Massaro AN; Hammad TA; Narang S; Essers J
Pediatrics; 2009 Jul; 124(1):205-10. PubMed ID: 19564301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of flow amplitudes on intraprong pressures during bubble versus ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants.
Kahn DJ; Habib RH; Courtney SE
Pediatrics; 2008 Nov; 122(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 18977980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.
Mazzella M; Bellini C; Calevo MG; Campone F; Massocco D; Mezzano P; Zullino E; Scopesi F; Arioni C; Bonacci W; Serra G
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2001 Sep; 85(2):F86-90. PubMed ID: 11517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study.
Yong SC; Chen SJ; Boo NY
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 Nov; 90(6):F480-3. PubMed ID: 15941825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A wandering nasal prong-a thing of risks and problems.
Peck DJ; Tulloh RM; Madden N; Petros AJ
Paediatr Anaesth; 1999; 9(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 10712720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room?
Aly H; Massaro AN; Patel K; El-Mohandes AA
Pediatrics; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1660-5. PubMed ID: 15930230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device.
Klausner JF; Lee AY; Hutchison AA
Pediatr Pulmonol; 1996 Sep; 22(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 8893258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect on lung function of continuous positive airway pressure administered either by infant flow driver or a single nasal prong.
Kavvadia V; Greenough A; Dimitriou G
Eur J Pediatr; 2000 Apr; 159(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 10789936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.
Finer NN; Carlo WA; Duara S; Fanaroff AA; Donovan EF; Wright LL; Kandefer S; Poole WK;
Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15342835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study.
Shoemaker MT; Pierce MR; Yoder BA; DiGeronimo RJ
J Perinatol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17262040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the use of early nasal CPAP associated with lower rates of chronic lung disease and retinopathy of prematurity? Nine years of experience with the Vermont Oxford Neonatal Network.
Kirchner L; Weninger M; Unterasinger L; Birnbacher R; Hayde M; Krepler R; Pollak A
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 15841616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-term physiological effects.
Ahluwalia JS; White DK; Morley CJ
Acta Paediatr; 1998 Mar; 87(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 9560042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in lung volume and work of breathing: A comparison of two variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very low birth weight infants.
Courtney SE; Aghai ZH; Saslow JG; Pyon KH; Habib RH
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2003 Sep; 36(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 12910587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants?
Aly H; Milner JD; Patel K; El-Mohandes AA
Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 15342841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants.
Ammari A; Suri M; Milisavljevic V; Sahni R; Bateman D; Sanocka U; Ruzal-Shapiro C; Wung JT; Polin RA
J Pediatr; 2005 Sep; 147(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 16182673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
