These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12109498)
1. Scientific method discourses in the construction of 'EMF' science: interests, resources and rhetoric in submissions to a public inquiry. Mercer D Soc Stud Sci; 2002 Apr; 32(2):205-33. PubMed ID: 12109498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2015 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Belyaev I; Dean A; Eger H; Hubmann G; Jandrisovits R; Johansson O; Kern M; Kundi M; Lercher P; Mosgöller W; Moshammer H; Müller K; Oberfeld G; Ohnsorge P; Pelzmann P; Scheingraber C; Thill R Rev Environ Health; 2015; 30(4):337-71. PubMed ID: 26613329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ambiguous evidence and institutional interpretation: an alternative view of electric and magnetic fields. Linder SH J Health Polit Policy Law; 1994; 19(1):165-90. PubMed ID: 8014408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of precaution-based approaches as EMF policy tools in community environments. Sahl J; Dolan M Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Sep; 104(9):908-11. PubMed ID: 8899365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: consensus points, recommendations, and rationales. Fragopoulou A; Grigoriev Y; Johansson O; Margaritis LH; Morgan L; Richter E; Sage C Rev Environ Health; 2010; 25(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 21268443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: a critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005-6). Lysaght T; Kerridge I Public Underst Sci; 2012 Feb; 21(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 22586845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms: an epidemiological study based on self-reported data and electronic medical records. Baliatsas C; Bolte J; Yzermans J; Kelfkens G; Hooiveld M; Lebret E; van Kamp I Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2015 May; 218(3):331-44. PubMed ID: 25704188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)? Otto M; von Mühlendahl KE Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Oct; 210(5):635-44. PubMed ID: 17765660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing potential health risks from electric powerlines: a decision analysis caught in controversy. von Winterfeldt D; Eppel T; Adams J; Neutra R; DelPizzo V Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1487-502. PubMed ID: 15660606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manufacturing doubt: journalists' roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Stocking SH; Holstein LW Public Underst Sci; 2009 Jan; 18(1):23-42. PubMed ID: 19579533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fielding a current idea: exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation. Genuis SJ Public Health; 2008 Feb; 122(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 17572456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A historical perspective of the popular use of electric and magnetic therapy. Basford JR Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Sep; 82(9):1261-9. PubMed ID: 11552201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk governance for mobile phones, power lines, and other EMF technologies. Kheifets L; Swanson J; Kandel S; Malloy TF Risk Anal; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1481-94. PubMed ID: 20723143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The scientific school of RAMS academician Iu.P. Lisitsyn in the field of public health and medicine]. Zhuravleva TV; Khmel' AA Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med; 2013; (2):40-1. PubMed ID: 23808044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Justifying molecular images in cell biology textbooks: From constructions to primary data. Serpente N Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2016 Feb; 55():105-16. PubMed ID: 26386516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies. Kheifets L; Sahl JD; Shimkhada R; Repacholi MH Risk Anal; 2005 Aug; 25(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 16268940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urban planning and public health at CDC. Kochtitzky CS; Frumkin H; Rodriguez R; Dannenberg AL; Rayman J; Rose K; Gillig R; Kanter T; MMWR Suppl; 2006 Dec; 55(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 17183243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Banning smoking in cars carrying children: an analytical history of a public health advocacy campaign. Freeman B; Chapman S; Storey P Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 18290915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Association or causation?" The debate on the scientific status of risk factor epidemiology, 1947-c. 1965. Berlivet L Clio Med; 2005; 75():39-74. PubMed ID: 16212726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [From "medicinal policy" to public health sciences: on the relationship between health experts and the state]. Schwartz FW Gesundheitswesen; 2006 Feb; 68(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 16482486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]