These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Microbial contamination of water by pipe and tubing material. 2. Growth of Legionella pneumophila]. Schoenen D; Schulze-Röbbecke R; Schirdewahn N Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1988 Jul; 186(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 3140536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative studies in vitro of the toxic effect of water extracts from synthetic materials in biological tests on living cells]. Paluch D Polim Med; 1982; 12(3-4):79-130. PubMed ID: 6764801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Microbial contamination of water by pipe and hose material. 1. Detection of colony count changes]. Schoenen D; Wehse A Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1988 May; 186(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 3138830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects. Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Jurado F J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jul; 183(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8673302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance]. Zywicka B Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The effect of active substances on nerve fiber regeneration in nerve tissue cultures]. Lindner G; Grosse G Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch; 1980; 94(6):1105-13. PubMed ID: 6269310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures. Hulbert SF; Morrison SJ; Klawitter JJ J Biomed Mater Res; 1972 Sep; 6(5):347-74. PubMed ID: 4116127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An explant culture system for the study of atrial development. Call TW; Lane RD; Arbogast J; Morse DE J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol; 1988 Jul; 20(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 3179995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of some factors affecting the efficiency of in vitro mussel tissue culture for chromosome preparation. Cornet M Cytobios; 1995; 84(336):7-12. PubMed ID: 8681609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of N and C terminal sequences of substance P on non-neuronal cells in vitro (nerve tissue culture)]. Lindner G Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch; 1984; 98(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 6202072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gallera method of chick embryo culture in vitro supports better growth compared with original New method. Ghatpande SK Dev Growth Differ; 2008 Aug; 50(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 18638167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biocompatibility test procedures for materials evaluation in vitro. I. Comparative test system sensitivity. Johnson HJ; Northup SJ; Seagraves PA; Garvin PJ; Wallin RF J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Jul; 17(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 6885840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Affinity of Staphylococcus epidermidis to various prosthetic graft materials. Demirer S; Geçim IE; Aydinuraz K; Ataoğlu H; Yerdel MA; Kuterdem E J Surg Res; 2001 Jul; 99(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 11421606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fine structure and organ culture of chick embryo dorsal aorta. Kischer CW; Jaqua M Scanning Microsc; 1989 Mar; 3(1):343-52; discussion 352-3. PubMed ID: 2740872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of varying chamber construction and embryo pre-incubation age on survival and growth of chick embryos in shell-less culture. Dunn BE; Fitzharris TP; Barnett BD Anat Rec; 1981 Jan; 199(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7224200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]