These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12110854)

  • 21. Crucial data on REACH not disclosed.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7292):1116-7. PubMed ID: 20414283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Food for thought ... on alternative methods for cosmetics safety testing.
    Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2008; 25(3):147-62. PubMed ID: 18841313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. European Commission responds to chemical testing story.
    English M
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7297):420. PubMed ID: 20505708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals.
    Greim HA
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 19034432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Problems in evaluation of chemicals toxicology safety and opportunity and status quo of research on animal experiment substitute method].
    Hou FX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(8):502-5. PubMed ID: 19358771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing.
    Piersma AH
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2006 May; 98(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 16635099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Streamlined chemical tests rebuffed.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some thoughts on the use of replacement alternatives for toxicity testing and risk assessment.
    Combes RD
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 83(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19212756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Letter to the editor: a regulatory view on the discussion on the role of alternative methods in the risk assessment of chemicals in the context of REACH.
    Gundert-Remy U; Bernauer U; Madle S; Oberemm A; Schulte A; Richter-Reichhelm HB
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19002668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies.
    Bhogal N; Grindon C; Combes R; Balls M
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Jun; 23(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 15922082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An integrated summary of commentary on the National Academy of Sciences report on ''Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy''.
    Gibson JE
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 29(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 20061466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Food for thought...on alternative methods for chemical safety testing.
    Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2010; 27(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 20390236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preclinical testing on insects predicts human haematotoxic potentials.
    Berger J
    Lab Anim; 2009 Oct; 43(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 19505933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protecting more than animals.
    Goldberg AM; Hartung T
    Sci Am; 2006 Jan; 294(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 16468438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. No animals harmed: toward a paradigm shift in toxicity testing.
    Zurlo J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; Suppl():S23-6. PubMed ID: 23138426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Not a walk in the park: the ECVAM whole embryo culture model challenged with pharmaceuticals and attempted improvements with random forest design.
    Thomson J; Johnson K; Chapin R; Stedman D; Kumpf S; Ozolinš TR
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 92(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 21370399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
    Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.