165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12111592)
21. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nd:YAG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite restoration.
Kawaguchi FA; Eduardo CP; Matos AB
Photomed Laser Surg; 2004 Aug; 22(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 15345172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities.
Obeidi A; Ghasemi A; Azima A; Ansari G
Photomed Laser Surg; 2005 Feb; 23(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 15782034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with a 10 percent maleic acid etchant.
Gilpatrick RO; Owens BM; Kaplan I; Cook G
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 76(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 9520749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of remaining demineralised dentine on dental microleakage accessed by a dye penetration: how to inhibit microleakage?
Piemjai M; Watanabe A; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 15240068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems.
Moldes VL; Capp CI; Navarro RS; Matos AB; Youssef MN; Cassoni A
J Adhes Dent; 2009 Jun; 11(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 19603586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of Er:YAG laser and air abrasion on the microleakage of a resin-based fissure sealant material.
Sancakli HS; Erdemir U; Yildiz E
Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Jul; 29(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21306230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser using three types of restorative materials.
Khan MF; Yonaga K; Kimura Y; Funato A; Matsumoto K
J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1998 Dec; 16(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 10204435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
