BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12111893)

  • 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for diagnostic examinations with uninterpretable cases.
    Lu Y; Heller DN; Zhao S
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1849-65. PubMed ID: 12111893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fuzzy receiver operating characteristic curve: an option to evaluate diagnostic tests.
    Castanho MJ; Barros LC; Yamakami A; Vendite LL
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 May; 11(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 17521074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the area under an ROC curve a valid measure of the performance of a screening or diagnostic test?
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24407586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodology of diagnostic tests in hepatology.
    Christensen E
    Ann Hepatol; 2009; 8(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19841495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
    Hwang YT; Wang CC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Least squares regression methods for clustered ROC data with discrete covariates.
    Tang LL; Zhang W; Li Q; Ye X; Chan L
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):747-65. PubMed ID: 26848938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
    Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
    Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
    Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
    Shi S; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 May; 96(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 17376185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.