These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

12543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12111919)

  • 1. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1539-58. PubMed ID: 12111919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.
    Bowden J; Tierney JF; Copas AJ; Burdett S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 21473747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of Stata software to test heterogeneity in meta-analysis method].
    Wang D; Mou ZY; Zhai JX; Zong HX; Zhao XD
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 19031771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies.
    Lin L; Chu H; Hodges JS
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):156-166. PubMed ID: 27167143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Dec; 9():86. PubMed ID: 20042080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3805-20. PubMed ID: 22763950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?
    Barili F; Parolari A; Kappetein PA; Freemantle N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 29868857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis.
    Gumedze FN; Jackson D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():19. PubMed ID: 21324180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of various estimates of the
    Wang Y; DelRocco N; Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 May; 33(5):745-764. PubMed ID: 38502022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation.
    Kriston L
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Mar; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 23494781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
    Cordero CP; Dans AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():149-151. PubMed ID: 33483004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.
    Melsen WG; Bootsma MC; Rovers MM; Bonten MJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 24320992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing results of large clinical trials to those of meta-analyses.
    Moses LE; Mosteller F; Buehler JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 11870817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.
    Engels EA; Schmid CH; Terrin N; Olkin I; Lau J
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(13):1707-28. PubMed ID: 10861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.
    Thompson SG; Sharp SJ
    Stat Med; 1999 Oct; 18(20):2693-708. PubMed ID: 10521860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New models for describing outliers in meta-analysis.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):314-28. PubMed ID: 26610739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
    Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1559-73. PubMed ID: 12111920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 628.