463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12112706)
1. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
Dominy BN; Brooks CL
J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
Lee MC; Duan Y
Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
Hsieh MJ; Luo R
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.
Lazaridis T; Karplus M
J Mol Biol; 1999 May; 288(3):477-87. PubMed ID: 10329155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions.
Forrest LR; Woolf TB
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 12910450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions.
Feig M; Brooks CL
Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 12211003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
Zhou R
Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Free energy surfaces of beta-hairpin and alpha-helical peptides generated by replica exchange molecular dynamics with the AGBNP implicit solvent model.
Felts AK; Harano Y; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):310-21. PubMed ID: 15211514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.
Berglund A; Head RD; Welsh EA; Marshall GR
Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 14696191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions.
Gatchell DW; Dennis S; Vajda S
Proteins; 2000 Dec; 41(4):518-34. PubMed ID: 11056039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft energy function and generic evolutionary method for discriminating native from nonnative protein conformations.
Chiu YY; Hwang JK; Yang JM
J Comput Chem; 2008 Jul; 29(9):1364-73. PubMed ID: 18181137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model of local-minima distribution on conformational space and its application to protein structure prediction.
Li H
Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):985-91. PubMed ID: 16838344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein refolding in silico with atom-based statistical potentials and conformational search using a simple genetic algorithm.
Fang Q; Shortle D
J Mol Biol; 2006 Jun; 359(5):1456-67. PubMed ID: 16678202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
