These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12112821)

  • 1. Déjà vu in pap testing: return of the 5% false-negative fraction and the zero-error rate.
    Renshaw AA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jun; 26(6):343-4. PubMed ID: 12112821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Value of cytological examination of the cervix uteri].
    Widy-Kierska K; Gadomska H; Siwik E
    Nowotwory; 1982; 32(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6193490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pap smear refined.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case-control study of true-positive versus false-negative cervical smears in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III.
    O'Sullivan JP; A'Hern RP; Chapman PA; Jenkins L; Smith R; al-Nafussi A; Brett MT; Herbert A; McKean ME; Waddell CA
    Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 9638376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal Pap smears with negative follow-up biopsies: improving cytohistologic correlations.
    Bewtra C; Pathan M; Hashish H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 14506671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cytologic smear false negative fraction. Reduction in a small community hospital.
    Wang SE; Ritchie MJ; Atkinson BF
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1690-6. PubMed ID: 9390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can acid phosphatase reduce pap test false-negative readings?
    Markovic O; Markovic N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Oct; 89(19):1459. PubMed ID: 9326916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inadequate cervical smear: what do we do?
    Phadnis SV; Doshi JS; Ogunnaike OO; Padwick ML; Sanusi FA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 15842215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pap smears. Do them right and every year--forever!
    Gall SA
    Postgrad Med; 1989 May; 85(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2710727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
    Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can we improve the detection of glandular cervical lesions: the role and limitations of the Pap smear diagnosis atypical glandular cells (AGC).
    Duska LR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):381-2. PubMed ID: 19647129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: false negative smears.
    Allen SM
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1996 Jun; 53(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 8757693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Pap smear revisited. Controversies and recent developments.
    Zuna RE
    Postgrad Med; 1984 Nov; 76(6):36-40, 42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 6494079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Milwaukee deaths reignite critical issues in cervical cancer screening.
    Voelker R
    JAMA; 1995 May 24-31; 273(20):1559-60. PubMed ID: 7745755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
    Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.