These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12112821)

  • 21. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the 5-year review of negative cervical smears in patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Tabbara SO; Sidawy MK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jul; 15(1):7-10; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 8807245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When your patient asks: "Doctor, I read there have been serious Pap smear errors. Shouldn't I get one of those new computer Pap smears?".
    Boronow RC; Cavett JR
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 39(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 9585689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience.
    Cross PA
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Smear tests: déjà vu.
    Nottingham J
    BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7311):517. PubMed ID: 11560149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Bethesda System, the pathology of preinvasive lesions, and screening technology. The Bethesda System (TBS) of nomenclature for cervical smears.
    Henry M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1996; (21):13-6. PubMed ID: 9101702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
    Frable WJ
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negative gynecologic smears as a quality assurance measure.
    Tabbara SO; Sidawy MK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 8834084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
    Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Rescreening of 8096 previous cases for current low-grade and indeterminate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion diagnoses--a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 323 laboratories.
    Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jun; 120(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 8651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
    Homesley HD
    Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abnormal pap smears in adolescents.
    Bacon J; Francoeur D; Goldfarb AF; Breech LL
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 16(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 12804941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled, non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsies.
    Dodd LG; Sneige N; Villarreal Y; Fanning CV; Staerkel GA; Caraway NP; Silva EG; Katz RL
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1993; 9(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 8513706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. HPV: from the cervical smear to the research bench to the court room.
    Atkins K
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 14692078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mistakes in cytopathology.
    Shane JJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Dec; 17(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 9407216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.