These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12113388)
21. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder. Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Health-related quality of life after salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Berge V; Baco E; Dahl AA; Karlsen SJ Int J Urol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 21771102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective assessment of voiding and sexual function after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma: comparison of radical prostatectomy to hormonobrachytherapy with and without external beam radiotherapy. Fulmer BR; Bissonette EA; Petroni GR; Theodorescu D Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2046-55. PubMed ID: 11391584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard. Giesler RB; Ashton CM; Brody B; Byrne MM; Cook K; Geraci JM; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP Med Care; 1999 Jun; 37(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 10386570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A review of measurement of patient preferences for treatment outcomes after prostate cancer. Lubeck DP; Grossfeld GD; Carroll PR Urology; 2002 Sep; 60(3 Suppl 1):72-7; discussion 77-8. PubMed ID: 12231054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Steginga SK; Occhipinti S; Gardiner RA; Yaxley J; Heathcote P Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15072894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radical prostatectomy versus high-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: effects on health-related quality of life. Jo Y; Junichi H; Tomohiro F; Yoshinari I; Masato F BJU Int; 2005 Jul; 96(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15963118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Single center experience with third-generation cryosurgery for management of organ-confined prostate cancer: critical evaluation of short-term outcomes, complications, and patient quality of life. Hubosky SG; Fabrizio MD; Schellhammer PF; Barone BB; Tepera CM; Given RW J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1521-31. PubMed ID: 18186694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance. Elstein AS; Chapman GB; Chmiel JS; Knight SJ; Chan C; Nadler RB; Kuzel TM; Siston AK; Bennett CL Health Expect; 2004 Jun; 7(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 15117386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity of utility measures for women with pelvic organ prolapse. Harvie HS; Lee DD; Andy UU; Shea JA; Arya LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):119.e1-119.e8. PubMed ID: 28988907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of life after radical treatment of prostate cancer: validation of the Italian version of the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index. Gacci M; Livi L; Paiar F; Detti B; Litwin MS; Bartoletti R; Giubilei G; Cai T; Mariani M; Carini M Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16098363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of techniques for eliciting patient preferences in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Schulz MW; Chen J; Woo HH; Keech M; Watson ME; Davey PJ J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 12050512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer. Albertsen PC; Nease RF; Potosky AL J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 9400461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting utility ratings for joint health States from single health States in prostate cancer: empirical testing of 3 alternative theories. Dale W; Basu A; Elstein A; Meltzer D Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 18057188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pilot study of a utilities-based treatment decision intervention for prostate cancer patients. Knight SJ; Nathan DP; Siston AK; Kattan MW; Elstein AS; Collela KM; Wolf MS; Slimack NS; Bennett CL; Golub RM Clin Prostate Cancer; 2002 Sep; 1(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 15046701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer. Bacon CG; Giovannucci E; Testa M; Kawachi I J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1804-10. PubMed ID: 11586228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training increase the quality of life in patients after radical prostatectomy? A randomized clinical study. Nilssen SR; Mørkved S; Overgård M; Lydersen S; Angelsen A Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Dec; 46(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 22746358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. Cook KF; Ashton CM; Byrne MM; Brody B; Geraci J; Giesler RB; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP Soc Sci Med; 2001 Nov; 53(10):1275-85. PubMed ID: 11676400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficacy of an assisted low-intensity programme of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training in improving the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Tienforti D; Sacco E; Marangi F; D'Addessi A; Racioppi M; Gulino G; Pinto F; Totaro A; D'Agostino D; Bassi P BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(7):1004-10. PubMed ID: 22332815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Schiffman RM; Walt JG; Jacobsen G; Doyle JJ; Lebovics G; Sumner W Ophthalmology; 2003 Jul; 110(7):1412-9. PubMed ID: 12867401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]