273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12115299)
1. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytologic-histologic correlation of screening and diagnostic Papanicolaou tests.
Chute DJ; Covell J; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jul; 34(7):503-6. PubMed ID: 16783779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extensively keratinized squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix are difficult to grade.
Faquin WC; Brown FM; Krane JF; Renshaw AA; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jan; 115(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11190810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC).
Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of p16INK4a as a diagnostic tool in the triage of Pap smears demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duncan L; Jacob S; Hubbard E
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 18186493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems.
Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
