These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12115299)
1. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear. Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia. Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria. Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear? Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extensively keratinized squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix are difficult to grade. Faquin WC; Brown FM; Krane JF; Renshaw AA; Cibas ES Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jan; 115(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11190810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test. Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression? Sherman ME; Kelly D Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Howell LP; Davis RL Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix]. Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC). Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis? Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of p16INK4a as a diagnostic tool in the triage of Pap smears demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Duncan L; Jacob S; Hubbard E Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 18186493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix. Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems. Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study. Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]