These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12116292)

  • 1. What do we learn from motor unit action potentials in surface electromyography?
    Roeleveld K; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve Suppl; 2002; 11():S92-7. PubMed ID: 12116292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the frequency content of the surface mechanomyographic signal reflect motor unit firing rates? A brief review.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Cramer JT; Weir JP; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16497517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insight into the motor unit activation and structure properties gained from EMG signal analysis.
    Zalewska E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):449-50. PubMed ID: 19243991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals.
    Gazzoni M; Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 15183268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique to track individual motor unit action potentials in surface EMG by monitoring their conduction velocities and amplitudes.
    Beck RB; Houtman CJ; O'Malley MJ; Lowery MM; Stegeman DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 15825864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG.
    Keenan KG; Farina D; Merletti R; Enoka RM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Jun; 100(6):1928-37. PubMed ID: 16397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor unit number estimates: A Holy Grail?
    Daube JR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2542-3. PubMed ID: 17910936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Counterpoint: spectral properties of the surface EMG do not provide information about motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber type.
    Farina D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1673-4. PubMed ID: 18984911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study on the classification of motor unit action potentials from single-channel surface EMG signal based on the wavelet analysis].
    Li Q; Yang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 27(4):893-7. PubMed ID: 20842866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cremaster muscle motor unit action potentials.
    Ozdemirkiran T; Ertekin C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 122(8):1679-85. PubMed ID: 21324736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions.
    Farina D; Falla D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Point: spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type.
    von Tscharner V; Nigg BM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1671-3. PubMed ID: 18483162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type.
    Rainoldi A
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1678. PubMed ID: 19031609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model of the magnetic fields created by single motor unit compound action potentials in skeletal muscle.
    Parker KK; Wikswo JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Oct; 44(10):948-57. PubMed ID: 9311164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Last word on point:counterpoint: spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber type.
    Farina D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1683. PubMed ID: 18984916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional spatial distribution of surface mechanomyographical response to single motor unit activity.
    Cescon C; Madeleine P; Graven-Nielsen T; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Jan; 159(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16876257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Last word on point:counterpoint: spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type.
    von Tscharner V; Nigg BM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Nov; 105(5):1682. PubMed ID: 18984915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical motor unit number estimation: from theory to practice.
    Lomen-Hoerth C; Slawnych MP
    Muscle Nerve; 2003 Sep; 28(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 12929186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approximation of motor unit structure from the analysis of motor unit potential.
    Zalewska E; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2501-6. PubMed ID: 18786859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.