These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12116433)

  • 1. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae).
    Sanderson MJ; Wojciechowski MF
    Syst Biol; 2000 Dec; 49(4):671-85. PubMed ID: 12116433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support.
    Müller KF
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():58. PubMed ID: 16255783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone.
    Leebens-Mack J; Raubeson LA; Cui L; Kuehl JV; Fourcade MH; Chumley TW; Boore JL; Jansen RK; depamphilis CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1948-63. PubMed ID: 15944438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes.
    McMahon MM; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):818-36. PubMed ID: 17060202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Homoplasy and clade support.
    Brandley MC; Warren DL; Leaché AD; McGuire JA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 20525577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1995 Mar; 4(1):44-63. PubMed ID: 7620635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HEXT, a software supporting tree-based screens for hybrid taxa in multilocus data sets, and an evaluation of the homoplasy excess test.
    Schneider K; Koblmüller S; Sefc KM
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 7(3):358-368. PubMed ID: 27066216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogenetics of Anthyllis (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Loteae): Partial incongruence between nuclear and plastid markers, a long branch problem and implications for morphological evolution.
    Degtjareva GV; Valiejo-Roman CM; Samigullin TH; Guara-Requena M; Sokoloff DD
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Feb; 62(2):693-707. PubMed ID: 22142737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Taxon influence index: assessing taxon-induced incongruities in phylogenetic inference.
    Mariadassou M; Bar-Hen A; Kishino H
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 22228800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of Terraces on Phylogenetic Inference.
    Sanderson MJ; McMahon MM; Stamatakis A; Zwickl DJ; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):709-26. PubMed ID: 25999395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
    McCracken K; Sorenson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling.
    Reddy S; Kimball RT; Pandey A; Hosner PA; Braun MJ; Hackett SJ; Han KL; Harshman J; Huddleston CJ; Kingston S; Marks BD; Miglia KJ; Moore WS; Sheldon FH; Witt CC; Yuri T; Braun EL
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):857-879. PubMed ID: 28369655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the phylogeny of papilionoid legumes: New insights from comprehensively sampled early-branching lineages.
    Cardoso D; de Queiroz LP; Pennington RT; de Lima HC; Fonty E; Wojciechowski MF; Lavin M
    Am J Bot; 2012 Dec; 99(12):1991-2013. PubMed ID: 23221500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets.
    Manos PS; Soltis PS; Soltis DE; Manchester SR; Oh SH; Bell CD; Dilcher DL; Stone DE
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 17558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms.
    Soltis DE; Soltis PS; Mort ME; Chase MW; Savolainen V; Hoot SB; Morton CM
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 12064239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncovering hidden phylogenetic consensus in large data sets.
    Pattengale ND; Aberer AJ; Swenson KM; Stamatakis A; Moret BM
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(4):902-11. PubMed ID: 21301032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
    Reeves PA; Richards CM
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogeny of Bembidion and related ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae: Bembidiini: Bembidiina).
    Maddison DR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jun; 63(3):533-76. PubMed ID: 22421212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split-specific bootstrap measures for quantifying phylogenetic stability and the influence of taxon selection.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Dec; 105():114-125. PubMed ID: 27568211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.