These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12116927)

  • 21. Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships.
    Townsend JP; Lopez-Giraldez F
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jul; 59(4):446-57. PubMed ID: 20547780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The importance of even highly incomplete fossil taxa in reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships of the tetraodontiformes (acanthomorpha: pisces).
    Santini F; Tyler JC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2004 Nov; 44(5):349-57. PubMed ID: 21676720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fossils impact as hard as living taxa in parsimony analyses of morphology.
    Cobbett A; Wilkinson M; Wills MA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):753-66. PubMed ID: 17886145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Likelihood of Tree Topologies with Fossils and Diversification Rate Estimation.
    Didier G; Fau M; Laurin M
    Syst Biol; 2017 Nov; 66(6):964-987. PubMed ID: 28431159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Morphological (and not anatomical or reproductive) features define early vascular plant phylogenetic relationships.
    Niklas KJ; Crepet WL
    Am J Bot; 2020 Mar; 107(3):477-488. PubMed ID: 32107771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis.
    Brochu CA
    Syst Biol; 1997 Sep; 46(3):479-522. PubMed ID: 11975331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
    Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility.
    O'Keefe FR; Wagner PJ
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(5):657-75. PubMed ID: 12116937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sampling diverse characters improves phylogenies: Craniodental and postcranial characters of vertebrates often imply different trees.
    Mounce RC; Sansom R; Wills MA
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):666-86. PubMed ID: 26899622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What does palaeontology contribute to systematics in a molecular world?
    Smith AB
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1998 Jun; 9(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 9667992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hide and vanish: data sets where the most parsimonious tree is known but hard to find, and their implications for tree search methods.
    Goloboff PA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Oct; 79():118-31. PubMed ID: 24952317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology.
    Asher RJ; Smith MR
    Syst Biol; 2022 Jun; 71(4):986-1008. PubMed ID: 34469583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem?
    Graybeal A
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 12064243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Building the monocot tree of death: Progress and challenges emerging from the macrofossil-rich Zingiberales.
    Smith SY; Iles WJD; Benedict JC; Specht CD
    Am J Bot; 2018 Aug; 105(8):1389-1400. PubMed ID: 30071130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A combined morphological and molecular phylogeny for sea urchins (Echinoidea: Echinodermata).
    Littlewood DT; Smith AB
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Jan; 347(1320):213-34. PubMed ID: 7746863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use and validity of composite taxa in phylogenetic analysis.
    Campbell V; Lapointe FJ
    Syst Biol; 2009 Dec; 58(6):560-72. PubMed ID: 20525609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum.
    Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():231-66. PubMed ID: 25152276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The phylogenetic position of Morotopithecus.
    Young NM; MacLatchy L
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Feb; 46(2):163-84. PubMed ID: 14871561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters.
    Harrison LB; Larsson HC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 25527198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.