260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12117184)
1. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).
Liberman L; Menell JH
Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):409-30, v. PubMed ID: 12117184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.
Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2005 May; 15(5):1027-36. PubMed ID: 15856253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.
Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties.
Stines J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17178447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound.
Mendelson EB; Berg WA; Merritt CR
Semin Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 36(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 11475068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BI-RADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49-year-old women.
McKay C; Hart CL; Erbacher G
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Oct; 100(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 11105450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management.
Raza S; Goldkamp AL; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL
Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213. PubMed ID: 20833845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic screening and reporting: a need for standardisation. A review.
Akhigbe AO; Igbinedion BO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2013 Dec; 20(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 24633281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BI-RADS categories.
Lederman R; Leichter I; Buchbinder S; Novak B; Bamberger P; Fields S
Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 12599001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the modified triple test.
Kwak JY; Kim EK; Park HL; Kim JY; Oh KK
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1255-61. PubMed ID: 16998097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the
Eghtedari M; Chong A; Rakow-Penner R; Ojeda-Fournier H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms.
Eberl MM; Fox CH; Edge SB; Carter CA; Mahoney MC
J Am Board Fam Med; 2006; 19(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 16513904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging of breast masses.
Bassett LW
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):669-91, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 10943270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
