These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12118805)
1. Hydrodynamic function of the second-generation mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Jennings LM; El-Gatit A; Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Jul; 74(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12118805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of free hand suturing technique and zero pressure fixation on the hydrodynamic function of aortic root and aortic valve leaflets. Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 9080156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro. Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluid-dynamic results of in vitro comparison of four pericardial bioprostheses implanted in small porcine aortic roots. Tasca G; Vismara R; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Pelenghi S; Antona C; Redaelli A; Gamba A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 47(2):e62-7. PubMed ID: 25414428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of sizing and method of fixation on the hydrodynamic function of stentless, free-hand inserted porcine bioprosthesis: an in vitro study. Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 9263877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The hydrodynamic function and leaflet dynamics of aortic and pulmonary roots and valves: an in vitro study. Weerasena N; Lockie KJ; Butterfield M; Fisher J; Kearney JN; Davies GA Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(7):350-6. PubMed ID: 1497926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional areas in stented and subcoronary stentless bioprostheses in pigs. Funder JA; Ringgaard S; Frost MW; Wierup P; Klaaborg KE; Hjortdal V; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 20357011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Performance of a Sutureless Bioprosthesis With Two Pericardial Stented Valves on Small Annuli: An In Vitro Study. Tasca G; Vismara R; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Contino M; Redaelli A; Fiore GB; Antona C Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 27544288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comprehensive Fluid Dynamic and Geometric Study for an "In-Vitro" Comparison of Four Surgically Implanted Pericardial Stented Valves. Tasca G; Vismara R; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Redaelli A; Antona C J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 26897839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study. Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Opening-closing pattern of four pericardial prostheses: results from an in vitro study of leaflet kinematics. Tasca G; Fiore GB; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Gamba A; Redaelli A; Antona C; Vismara R J Artif Organs; 2016 Dec; 19(4):350-356. PubMed ID: 27230086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients. Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of the porcine pulmonary valve and root with regard to the ross procedure. Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 120(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 10917944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses. Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]