These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12119861)

  • 1. Beyond intention to treat.
    Goetghebeur E; Loeys T
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 12119861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assuring that double-blind is blind.
    Perlis RH; Ostacher M; Fava M; Nierenberg AA; Sachs GS; Rosenbaum JF
    Am J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 167(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 20194487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management and conduct of randomized controlled trials.
    Knatterud GL
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 12119852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deliberate ignorance: a systematic review of blinding in nursing clinical trials.
    Polit DF; Gillespie BM; Griffin R
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 21127453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addressing missing participant outcome data in dental clinical trials.
    Spineli LM; Fleming PS; Pandis N
    J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):605-18. PubMed ID: 25837533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Ranstam J; Cook JA
    Br J Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(11):1578-1579. PubMed ID: 28895139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative analyses for antiepileptic drug trials.
    Pledger GW; Sahlroot JT
    Epilepsy Res Suppl; 1993; 10():167-74. PubMed ID: 8251092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Physicians do not treat averages--but therapy responders!].
    Maier C; Baron R
    Schmerz; 2012 Feb; 26(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 22366929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performing baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials.
    Galal U; Fanshawe TR
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Oct; 25(5):183. PubMed ID: 31796579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trials in neuropathic pain: a descriptive study based on a systematic review.
    Sauzet O; Williams JE; Ross J; Branford R; Farquhar-Smith P; Griffith GL; Fox-Rushby JA; Peacock JL
    Clin J Pain; 2013 Jul; 29(7):591-9. PubMed ID: 23042476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
    Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intention-to-treat or efficacy analysis?
    Horne D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Apr; 53(489):324; author reply 324-5. PubMed ID: 12879836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trials or population-based registries.
    Bergqvist D; Björck M; Säwe J; Troëng T
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 17689818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased view.
    Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 19342465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neglected issue in interpretation of results of randomized controlled trials: informative censoring.
    Gorouhi F; Khatami A; Davari P
    Dermatol Online J; 2009 Jan; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 19281718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research.
    Newell DJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 1992 Oct; 21(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 1468842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring multi-armed trials.
    Proschan MA; Follmann DA; Geller NL
    Stat Med; 1994 Jul 15-30; 13(13-14):1441-52. PubMed ID: 7973223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the prevention and analysis of missing data in randomized clinical trials: the state of the art.
    Scharfstein DO; Hogan J; Herman A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80-4. PubMed ID: 22810454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.