737 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12120767)
1. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Hucke RD; Smith GE
Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
Bonilla E; White SN
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams.
Kennington LB; Davis RD; Murchison DF; Langenderfer WR
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 10388372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
Ahrari F; Nojoomian M; Moosavi H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations.
Borgmeijer PJ; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 1939803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
Al-Omari QD; Al-Omari WM; Omar R
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19455848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
