BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12121743)

  • 1. Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex.
    Cunningham J; Nicol T; King C; Zecker SG; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):97-111. PubMed ID: 12121743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.
    Presacco A; Simon JZ; Anderson S
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2346-2355. PubMed ID: 27535374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
    White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.
    Ranasinghe KG; Vrana WA; Matney CJ; Kilgard MP
    Neuroscience; 2013 Nov; 252():80-97. PubMed ID: 23954862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech sound representation, perception, and plasticity: a neurophysiologic perceptive.
    Kraus N; McGee TJ; Koch DB
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(2-3):168-82. PubMed ID: 9575383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual Differences in Human Auditory Processing: Insights From Single-Trial Auditory Midbrain Activity in an Animal Model.
    White-Schwoch T; Nicol T; Warrier CM; Abrams DA; Kraus N
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5095-5115. PubMed ID: 28334187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.
    Engineer CT; Rahebi KC; Buell EP; Fink MK; Kilgard MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():256-64. PubMed ID: 25827927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural unmasking of the accuracy of envelope-signal representation in rat auditory cortex but not auditory midbrain.
    Xu N; Luo L; Wang Q; Li L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():224-233. PubMed ID: 30991272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.
    Bidelman GM; Alain C
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(3):1240-9. PubMed ID: 25609638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech enhancement for listeners with hearing loss based on a model for vowel coding in the auditory midbrain.
    Rao A; Carney LH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 61(7):2081-91. PubMed ID: 24686228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.
    Souffi S; Lorenzi C; Varnet L; Huetz C; Edeline JM
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(27):5228-5246. PubMed ID: 32444386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.
    Song JH; Skoe E; Banai K; Kraus N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2268-79. PubMed ID: 20681749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.
    Krizman J; Skoe E; Kraus N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):590-7. PubMed ID: 21855407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.
    Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; White-Schwoch T; Otto-Meyer S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():148-157. PubMed ID: 27864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():42-53. PubMed ID: 28927640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.