These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12122235)
1. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height. Hedia HS Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions. Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants. Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant. Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone. Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs. Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]