These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1212476)

  • 1. Electrodermal responses, subject control and delay of aversive stimulation.
    Björkstrand P
    Biol Psychol; 1975 Sep; 3(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 1212476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrodermal responses, subject control and delay of aversive stimulation.
    Björkstrand PA
    Biol Psychol; 1975 Sep; 3(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 1225365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conditioned response-contingent delays of the unconditioned stimulus in human aversive conditioning.
    Prokasy WF; Clark CG; Williams WC; Spurr CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Sep; 1(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 1176893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fear relevance and diminution of unconditioned skin conductance responses.
    Merckelbach H; van den Hout MA
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1991; 199(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 1685608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 17241153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in electrodermal responsivity to predictable aversive stimuli and substance dependence.
    Taylor J; Carlson SR; Iacono WG; Lykken DT; McGue M
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Mar; 36(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 10194966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural, electrodermal and behavioral response patterns in contingency aware and unaware subjects during a picture-picture conditioning paradigm.
    Klucken T; Kagerer S; Schweckendiek J; Tabbert K; Vaitl D; Stark R
    Neuroscience; 2009 Jan; 158(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 18976695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instrumental conditioning of skin potential responses in curarized cats: non specific effects of a punishment procedure.
    Brochard J; Delerm B; Sequeira-Martinho H; Roy JC
    Arch Ital Biol; 1991 Mar; 129(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 1872685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Psychophysiologic reactions to predictable aversive stimuli in a delayed conditioning paradigm: reinstatement of the orientating reaction or informational control?].
    Baltissen R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1998; 45(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 9659005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In dubio pro defensio: initial activation of conditioned fear is not cue specific.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 122(3):685-96. PubMed ID: 18513138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning-related diminution of unconditioned SCR and fMRI signal responses.
    Knight DC; Waters NS; King MK; Bandettini PA
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):843-8. PubMed ID: 19616105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrodermal responses as affected by subject- versus experimenter-controlled noxious stimulation.
    Björkstrand PA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 4705243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Recio G; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 19022336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Inhibition of a conditioned reflex evoked emotional response as an "instrument" of avoidance].
    Popova EI; Koptelova IA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1979; 29(6):1123-32. PubMed ID: 532338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Methods for quantifying phasic skin conductance amplitudes: threats to validity?].
    Zimmer H; Vossel G
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(4):676-702. PubMed ID: 8310721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies.
    Tabbert K; Stark R; Kirsch P; Vaitl D
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):761-70. PubMed ID: 16651009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the stress hormone cortisol on fear conditioning in humans: evidence for sex differences in the response of the prefrontal cortex.
    Stark R; Wolf OT; Tabbert K; Kagerer S; Zimmermann M; Kirsch P; Schienle A; Vaitl D
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1290-8. PubMed ID: 16839780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 9643060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Change in the event-related skin conductivity: an indicator of the immediate importance of elaborate information processing?].
    Zimmer H
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(3):493-513. PubMed ID: 1441653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of trait anxiety on autonomic response and cognitive performance during an anticipatory anxiety task.
    Barrett J; Armony JL
    Depress Anxiety; 2006; 23(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 16511831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.