These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12125794)

  • 1. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique.
    Wassell RW; Barker D; Walls AW
    Br Dent J; 2002 Jun; 192(12):679-84, 687-90. PubMed ID: 12125794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing qualities of impressions that may lead to occlusal discrepancies with indirect restorations.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A procedure for making fixed prosthodontic impressions with the use of preformed crown shells.
    Dimashkieh MR; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 7699606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparasion of clinical and technical operating time of full-crown restorations between traditional and Triple-tray impression techniques].
    Xing YX; Peng D; Wang YG
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 44(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 22353920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified clinical technique for a routine indirect restoration impression on a challenging patient using a dry field illuminator.
    Santucci NM; Santucci ET; Geissberger M
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 23675740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The double arch impression technique: a solution to prevent supraocclusion in the indirect restoration.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 11199562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triple tray crown and bridge procedures: a guide to how dental assistants can assist the dentist: part 1.
    Mamoun JS; Javaid M
    Dent Assist; 2013; 82(3):14-8, 20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 23858695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making multiple predictable single-unit provisional restorations using an indirect technique.
    Hansen PA; Sigler E; Husemann RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 19782829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II.
    Kaplowitz GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Sep; 128(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 9297950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medium-viscosity polyether impression material: a case report.
    Ritter AV; Swift EJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):993-6, 998, 1000, passim; quiz 1006. PubMed ID: 11968150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.