These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12125990)

  • 1. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Balkany TJ; Eshraghi AA; Yang N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 122(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 12125990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Luxford W; Leake P
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):68-79. PubMed ID: 15855031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants.
    Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
    Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Roland JT; Luxford W; Leake PA
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 15855030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs.
    Eshraghi AA; Yang NW; Balkany TJ
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Mar; 113(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 12616189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
    Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.
    Saunders E; Cohen L; Aschendorff A; Shapiro W; Knight M; Stecker M; Richter B; Waltzman S; Tykocinski M; Roland T; Laszig R; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. PubMed ID: 11883764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.
    Tykocinski M; Cohen LT; Pyman BC; Roland T; Treaba C; Palamara J; Dahm MC; Shepherd RK; Xu J; Cowan RS; Cohen NL; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 10733185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Micro-focus fluoroscopy - a great tool for electrode development.
    Xu J; Briggs R; Tykocinski M; Newbold C; Risi F; Cowan R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():115-9. PubMed ID: 19142879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.
    Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():6917084. PubMed ID: 31240221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
    Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship Between Electrode-to-Modiolus Distance and Current Levels for Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Davis TJ; Zhang D; Gifford RH; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26649603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modifying cochlear implant design: advantages of placing a return electrode in the modiolus.
    Ho SY; Wiet RJ; Richter CP
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Jul; 25(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 15241228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
    van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.
    van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design.
    Tykocinski M; Saunders E; Cohen LT; Treaba C; Briggs RJ; Gibson P; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 11314713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery.
    Gstoettner WK; Adunka O; Franz P; Hamzavi J; Plenk H; Susani M; Baumgartner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 11349782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.