298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12127003)
1. Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2002 Aug; 76(4-5):633-44. PubMed ID: 12127003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats.
Ackroff K; Rozental D; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2004 Jun; 81(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 15178165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing.
Lucas F; Azzara AV; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 63(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9402608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons.
Warwick ZS; Bowen KJ; Synowski SJ
Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 62(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 9383120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.
Yu WZ; Sclafani A; Delamater AR; Bodnar RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Nov; 64(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 10548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.
Yu WZ; Silva RM; Sclafani A; Delamater AR; Bodnar RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2000 Apr; 65(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10764916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric ethanol with limited access training.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2003 Apr; 75(1):223-33. PubMed ID: 12759131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flavor preferences conditioned by post-oral infusion of monosodium glutamate in rats.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2011 Sep; 104(3):488-94. PubMed ID: 21605576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.
Ackroff K; Touzani K; Peets TK; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2001 Apr; 72(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 11337001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests.
Warwick ZS; Weingarten HP
Physiol Behav; 1996 Sep; 60(3):711-5. PubMed ID: 8873241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose.
Azzara AV; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fat infusions in rats.
Lucas F; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1989 Sep; 46(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 2623061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flavor preference produced by intragastric polycose infusions in rats using a concurrent conditioning procedure.
Drucker DB; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1993 Aug; 54(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 8372131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some failures of intragastric NaCl infusions to support flavor preference learning.
Tordoff MG; Coldwell SE
Physiol Behav; 2002 Aug; 76(4-5):511-9. PubMed ID: 12126987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rats acquire stronger preference for flavors consumed towards the end of a high-fat meal.
Myers KP
Physiol Behav; 2013 Feb; 110-111():179-89. PubMed ID: 23313407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flavor quality and ethanol concentration affect ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2002 Dec; 74(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 12376172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Sep; 89(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 16854441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
