These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12127892)

  • 1. Commentary on the Kennedy Krieger Institute Lead Paint Repair and Maintenance Study.
    Pinder L
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):477-9. PubMed ID: 12127892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriate risk exposure in environmental health research. The Kennedy-Krieger lead abatement study.
    Nelson RM
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 12127884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nontherapeutic research, minimal risk, and the Kennedy Krieger lead abatement study.
    Nelson RM
    IRB; 2001; 23(6):7-11. PubMed ID: 12737175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics in pediatric environmental health: lessons from lead.
    Mielke HW
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 12127889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental consent for children's participation in biomedical research: the ethical, regulatory, and judicial framework of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Thiel KS
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):169-93. PubMed ID: 15017956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The lead-based paint abatement repair and maintenance study in Baltimore: historic framework and study design.
    Pollak J
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 15017953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Kennedy Krieger case: judicial anger and the research enterprise.
    Schwartz J
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):148-68. PubMed ID: 15017955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethically questionable research with children: the Kennedy Krieger Lead Abatement Study.
    Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):167-75. PubMed ID: 12816125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whose duty is it anyway?: the Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research.
    Hoffmann DE; Rothenberg KH
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):109-47. PubMed ID: 15017954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Maryland Court of Appeals
    Wests Atl Report; 2001; 782():807-62. PubMed ID: 15765579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical challenges in conducting pediatric environmental health research. Introduction.
    Bellinger DC; Dietrich KN
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):443. PubMed ID: 12127883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When "risk" and "benefit" are open to interpretation--as is generally the case.
    Spriggs M
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 Mar; 7(3):17-9. PubMed ID: 17366223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confronting the ethical challenges of environmental health research.
    Ryan D; Farr N
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 12127890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children as subjects in nontherapeutic research. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Pearce M
    J Leg Med; 2002 Sep; 23(3):421-36. PubMed ID: 12230814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.
    Kopelman LM
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):177-92. PubMed ID: 12816126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research on environmental health interventions: ethical problems and solutions.
    Resnik DB; Zeldin DC; Sharp RR
    Account Res; 2005; 12(2):69-101. PubMed ID: 16220621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "greater good"...at what cost?: how nontherapeutic scientific studies can now create viable negligence claims in Maryland after Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Gray CR
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 2002; 32(1):73-95. PubMed ID: 15233132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.
    Spriggs M
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Apr; 30(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 15082813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.
    Wendler D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Jun; 14(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 15281189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human subjects. Court rebukes Hopkins for lead paint study.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5535):1567-9. PubMed ID: 11533449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.