BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12128016)

  • 1. Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms.
    Grove PM; Gillam B; Ono H
    Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1859-70. PubMed ID: 12128016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Ben Sachtler WL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3771-4. PubMed ID: 16938332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecologically invalid monocular texture leads to longer perceptual latencies in random-dot stereograms.
    Grove PM; Ono H
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 10664759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disparity in Context: Understanding how monocular image content interacts with disparity processing in human visual cortex.
    Duan Y; Thatte J; Yaklovleva A; Norcia AM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118139. PubMed ID: 33964460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of random dot stereograms and correlograms free of monocular cues.
    Radó J; Sári Z; Buzás P; Jandó G
    J Vis; 2020 Apr; 20(4):3. PubMed ID: 32271895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head movements.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Ono H
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1027-35. PubMed ID: 17337029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saccade amplitude disconjugacy induced by aniseikonia: role of monocular depth cues.
    Pia Bucci M; Kapoula Z; Eggert T
    Vision Res; 1999 Sep; 39(18):3109-22. PubMed ID: 10664808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of colour as a monocular depth cue.
    Troscianko T; Montagnon R; Le Clerc J; Malbert E; Chanteau PL
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(11):1923-9. PubMed ID: 1771776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computational theory of da Vinci stereopsis.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24914063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
    Häkkinen J; Nyman G
    Vision Res; 2001 Jan; 41(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 11163853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.