136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1213079)
1. The IUD revisited.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(6):244-7. PubMed ID: 1213079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Martorella LA; Esposito JM
J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the spring coil and Dalkon shield.
Kisnisci HA
Acta Reprod Turc; 1981 Oct; 3(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12264524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices.
Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D
CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD].
Elia D; Belaisch J
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
Mumford SD; Kessel E
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study.
Bayer LL; Jensen JT; Li H; Nichols MD; Bednarek PH
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 22560185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of three IUDs.
Ditchik PM; Ditchik JM
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Apr; 5(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 12266197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with the Dalkon Shield as a contraceptive device.
Perlmutter JF
Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Mar; 43(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 4814463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation and follow-up on 3,829 IUD procedures.
Hindle WH
Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1978; 45():105-10. PubMed ID: 715859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of age on the clinical performance of IUD in nulliparous and parous women: an analysis of 1144 insertions.
Kaivola S; Hirvonen E
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Jan; 5(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12312748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Florida's experience with an intrauterine device for the nulliparous patients.
Caraway AF
J Reprod Med; 1975 Sep; 15(3):114-6. PubMed ID: 1214252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Dalkon Shield, the TCu 200, and the TCu 380A in private practice.
Thomas WO
Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1977; 44():78-85. PubMed ID: 335580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Letter: Dalkon shield and septic abortion.
Briggs MH
Med J Aust; 1975 Jan; 1(3):81. PubMed ID: 1128373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term use of intrauterine devices.
Novak MK; Andolsek L; Balogh SA; Waszak CS
IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Feb; 22(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experience with intrauterine contraception. Survey of 600 IUD users at the S. Anna University Hospital in Rome].
Calzolari E; Girolametti C; Parisi C; Iannucci D; Steffè M; Ciampaglia G
Minerva Ginecol; 1988 May; 40(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 3059239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The experience with Dalkon shield in UCLA family planning clinic].
Wang AC
Nihon Funin Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jul; 19():248-53. PubMed ID: 12158546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contraception with intrauterine devices.
Parr EL
Bioscience; 1973 May; 23(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4803454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
