202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12131299)
1. Percent Gleason grade 4/5 as prognostic factor in prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection.
Egevad L; Granfors T; Karlberg L; Bergh A; Stattin P
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):509-13. PubMed ID: 12131299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in Iceland: a population-based study of stage, Gleason grade, treatment and long-term survival in males diagnosed between 1983 and 1987.
Jonsson E; Sigbjarnarson HP; Tomasson J; Benediktsdottir KR; Tryggvadottir L; Hrafnkelsson J; Olafsdottir EJ; Tulinius H; Jonasson JG
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 16916765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival.
Tollefson MK; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Zincke H; Blute ML
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):547-51. PubMed ID: 16406993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competing risk analysis after radical prostatectomy for clinically nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma according to clinical Gleason score and patient age.
Sweat SD; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Blute ML; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):525-9. PubMed ID: 12131302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.
Gofrit ON; Zorn KC; Taxy JB; Lin S; Zagaja GP; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8. PubMed ID: 17868725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy, bcl-2 and p53 in localized prostate adenocarcinoma incidentally discovered at transurethral prostatectomy.
Abaza R; Diaz LK; Laskin WB; Pins MR
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2701-5. PubMed ID: 17085199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden.
Andrén O; Fall K; Franzén L; Andersson SO; Johansson JE; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1337-40. PubMed ID: 16515993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive and novel predictive modeling technique using detailed pathology factors in men with localized prostate carcinoma.
Potters L; Purrazzella R; Brustein S; Fearn P; Leibel SA; Kattan MW
Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1451-6. PubMed ID: 12237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.
Albertsen PC; Hanley JA; Barrows GH; Penson DF; Kowalczyk PD; Sanders MM; Fine J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Sep; 97(17):1248-53. PubMed ID: 16145045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a prediction model for low volume/low grade cancer: application in selecting patients for active surveillance.
Ochiai A; Trpkov K; Yilmaz A; Donnelly B; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 17296373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic features in men who died of prostate cancer.
Thompson KE; Hernández J; Canby-Hagino ED; Troyer D; Thompson IM
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):553-6; discussion 556. PubMed ID: 16006890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serum insulin level, disease stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Lehrer S; Diamond EJ; Stagger S; Stone NN; Stock RG
Br J Cancer; 2002 Sep; 87(7):726-8. PubMed ID: 12232754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate-specific antigen velocity and prostate cancer gleason grade and stage.
Pinsky PF; Andriole G; Crawford ED; Chia D; Kramer BS; Grubb R; Greenlee R; Gohagan JK
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(8):1689-95. PubMed ID: 17330856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
