233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12131372)
1. Evaluation of a dissolvable ureteral drainage stent in a Swine model.
Auge BK; Ferraro RF; Madenjian AR; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):808-12. PubMed ID: 12131372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model.
Olweny EO; Landman J; Andreoni C; Collyer W; Kerbl K; Onciu M; Välimaa T; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2198-202. PubMed ID: 11956478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model.
Chew BH; Lange D; Paterson RF; Hendlin K; Monga M; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):765-71. PubMed ID: 20022028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome.
Chew BH; Paterson RF; Clinkscales KW; Levine BS; Shalaby SW; Lange D
J Urol; 2013 Feb; 189(2):719-25. PubMed ID: 22982432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drainage and antireflux characteristics of a biodegradable self-reinforced, self-expanding X-ray-positive poly-L,D-lactide spiral partial ureteral stent: an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Kauppinen T; Talja M; Alhava E; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 18186698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New bioabsorbable polylactide ureteral stent in the treatment of ureteral lesions: an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Tunninen V; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Endourol; 1999 Mar; 13(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10213104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant ureteral obstruction: preliminary results of treatment with metallic self-expandable stents.
Flueckiger F; Lammer J; Klein GE; Hausegger K; Lederer A; Szolar D; Tamussino K
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 8416559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of paclitaxel-eluting metal mesh stents within the pig ureter: an experimental study.
Liatsikos EN; Karnabatidis D; Kagadis GC; Rokkas K; Constantinides C; Christeas N; Flaris N; Voudoukis T; Scopa CD; Perimenis P; Filos KS; Nikiforidis GC; Stolzenburg JU; Siablis D
Eur Urol; 2007 Jan; 51(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 16814926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coated v noncoated ureteral metal stents: an experimental model.
Liatsikos EN; Siablis D; Kalogeropoulou C; Karnabatidis D; Triadopoulos A; Varaki L; Zabakis P; Perimenis P; Barbalias GA
J Endourol; 2001 Sep; 15(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 11697409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroscopic removal of mildly migrated stents using local anesthesia only.
Livadas KE; Varkarakis IM; Skolarikos A; Karagiotis E; Alivizatos G; Sofras F; Deliveliotis C; Bissas A
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1998-2001. PubMed ID: 17869304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a new polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent to a noncovered stent in canine ureters.
Chung HH; Lee SH; Cho SB; Park HS; Kim YS; Kang BC; Frisoli JK; Razavi MK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 18214599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a biodegradable ureteral stent versus the traditional double-J stent for the treatment of ureteral injury: an experimental study.
Fu WJ; Wang ZX; Li G; Cui FZ; Zhang Y; Zhang X
Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 7(6):065002. PubMed ID: 23047290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo evaluation of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent.
Mucksavage P; Pick D; Haydel D; Etafy M; Kerbl DC; Lee JY; Ortiz-Vanderdys C; Saleh F; Olamendi S; Louie MK; McDougall EM
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 22386429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prototype of a reflux-preventing ureteral stent and its clinical use.
Yamaguchi O; Yoshimura Y; Irisawa C; Shiraiwa Y
Urology; 1992 Oct; 40(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 1413349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel dual-lumen ureteral stents provide better ureteral flow than single ureteral stent in ex vivo porcine kidney model of extrinsic ureteral obstruction.
Hafron J; Ost MC; Tan BJ; Fogarty JD; Hoenig DM; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 17070391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year experience with metallic stents for chronic ureteral obstruction.
Kadlec AO; Ellimoottil CS; Greco KA; Turk TM
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):937-41. PubMed ID: 23485505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a New Design of Antireflux-biodegradable Ureteral Stent in Animal Model.
Soria F; Morcillo E; Serrano A; Budia A; Fernández I; Fernández-Aparicio T; Sanchez-Margallo FM
Urology; 2018 May; 115():59-64. PubMed ID: 29470998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phase I trial of a temporary ureteral drainage stent.
Lingeman JE; Schulsinger DA; Kuo RL
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 12803989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]