These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12131862)

  • 1. Pressure ulcer classification: the systems and the pitfalls.
    Russell L
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Jun; 11(12 Suppl):S49-50, S52, S54-7 passim. PubMed ID: 12131862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Policy implications of using reverse staging to monitor pressure ulcer status.
    Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 9362575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.
    Beeckman D; Schoonhoven L; Fletcher J; Furtado K; Gunningberg L; Heyman H; Lindholm C; Paquay L; VerdĂș J; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(6):682-91. PubMed ID: 18039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How accurate are pressure ulcer grades? An image-based survey of nurse performance.
    Russell LJ; Reynolds TM
    J Tissue Viability; 2001 Apr; 11(2):67, 70-5. PubMed ID: 11949377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of pressure sores: 1.
    Young T
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Apr 11-24; 5(7):438, 440, 442 passim. PubMed ID: 8788393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of pressure ulcer staging: a review of literature and 1 institution's strategy.
    Bruce TA; Shever LL; Tschannen D; Gombert J
    Crit Care Nurs Q; 2012; 35(1):85-101. PubMed ID: 22157495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is a grade 4 pressure ulcer not grade 4?
    Briggs SL
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S4, S6, S8-9. PubMed ID: 22067935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure ulcer classification: defining early skin damage.
    Russell L
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Sep; 11(16 Suppl):S33-4, S36, S38, S40-1. PubMed ID: 12362151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Nov; 13(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 15533101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing nurses' ability to classify pressure ulcers correctly.
    Kelly J; Isted M
    Nurs Stand; 2011 Oct 19-25; 26(7):62, 64, 66 passim. PubMed ID: 23256259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure ulcer classification: what do we have? What do we need?
    Cuddigan J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):13-5. PubMed ID: 9362571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
    Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnosis and classification of pressure ulcers and other skin lesions: interrater reliability and agreement].
    Kottner J; Dassen T; Heinze C
    Pflege Z; 2009 Apr; 62(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 19365943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Apr; 27(2):144-50, 156. PubMed ID: 17494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-blanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 17239068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A temporary solution to reverse staging: the skin care evaluation sheet.
    Wright KD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Aug; 43(7):28-32. PubMed ID: 9282044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recurring pressure ulcers: identifying the definitions. A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel white paper.
    Tew C; Hettrick H; Holden-Mount S; Grigsby R; Rhodovi J; Moore L; Ghaznavi AM; Siddiqui A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 24844329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of pressure ulcer grading scales: a study of clinical utility and inter-rater reliability.
    Pedley GE
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 14725777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.