These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12131881)

  • 1. Application of a 3-dimensional measurement system to complete denture impressions.
    Rignon-Bret C; Dupuis R; Gaudy JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):603-12. PubMed ID: 12131881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of accuracy of the wash impression technique to rebase and replace the resilient part of a soft-lined denture.
    Burrell CJ; Russell MD; Stewart J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 2056460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
    Brosky ME; Major RJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sectional impressions for mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures.
    el-Sheikh HA; Abdel-Hakim AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 9710826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On Comparing Two Different Tray-Holding Techniques for Edentulous Maxillary Impressions.
    Rignon-Bret C; Mushegyan V; Naveau A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 26929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of impression procedures for distal extension removable partial dentures.
    Madihalli AU; Tavane PN; Yadav NS; Abraham S; Reddy PM; Baiju G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 22269192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Randomised Controlled Study Comparing the Anterior Mandibular Labio-Lingual Neutral Zone Position in Edentulous Subjects With and Without Their Maxillary Denture In-Situ.
    Birtles A; Craddock H; Kang J; Hyde TP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Jun; 23(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26373201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques.
    Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Mancl L; Brudvik JS; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 24079558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary denture displacement during reline impression procedure.
    Javid NS; Michael CG; Mohammed HA; Colaizzi FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 3903120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impression making.
    McCord JF; Grant AA
    Br Dent J; 2000 May; 188(9):484-92. PubMed ID: 10859847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional stability of complete denture permanent acrylic resin denture bases; A comparison of dimensions before and after a second curing cycle.
    Fenlon MR; Juszczyk AS; Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 20397501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional impressions for complete denture fabrication. A modified jump technique.
    Haney SJ; Nicoll R; Mansueto M
    Tex Dent J; 2010 Apr; 127(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 20446488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of adding impression material to mandibular denture space in Piezography.
    Ikebe K; Okuno I; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 16671986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-step impression for atrophic mandibular ridge.
    Dhananjay SG; Ashwini YK; Gangadhar SA; Lagdive SB; Pai UY
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e1195-7. PubMed ID: 22288495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy.
    Brosky ME; Pesun IJ; Lowder PD; Delong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 11854678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.