These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12131893)

  • 1. A simple method of making an implant-level impression when presented with limited space, unfavorable implant positions, or problematic implant angulations.
    Chaimattayompol N; Arbree NS; Wong SX
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12131893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new, simple implant-level impression technique for dental implants in limited interproximal space.
    Saboury A; Hadi A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 22372961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The O-ring universal impression technique.
    Hussaini S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impression technique for a complete-arch prosthesis with multiple implants using additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Oteo-Calatayud J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):714-720. PubMed ID: 27889076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid protocol for restoring a tissue abutment-supported fixed bridge.
    Clepper DP
    Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):62-7. PubMed ID: 12524869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant-supported titanium prostheses following augmentation procedures: a clinical report.
    Knabe C; Hoffmeister B
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Mar; 48(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 14640159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft liner-retained, implant-supported overdenture: a technical note.
    Cain JR; Mitchell DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):857-60. PubMed ID: 9857598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.