These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1213260)

  • 1. [About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].
    Altmann P; Georgiades E; Reinold E; Wagenbichler P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):949-55. PubMed ID: 1213260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E; Reinold E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Significance of trial vacuum extraction in the framework of obstetric surgery in vertex presentation].
    Krause W; Frenzel J; Raphael M; Michels W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Aug; 45(8):539-45. PubMed ID: 4043705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Connexions between instrumental delivery and cerebral damage in the infant (author's transl)].
    Naske R; Poustka F; Presslich O; Schubert H; Zapotoczky HG; Altmann P; Schaller A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1976 May; 88(10):319-24. PubMed ID: 997523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
    de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Some considerations on forceps delivery with excenter handle (author's transl)].
    Janisch H; Altmann P; Leodolter S; Reinold E
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1975 Oct; 179(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 1210477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Advantages and disadvantages of deliveries after induction of labour by convenience (author's transl)].
    Bolte A; Breuker KH; Haase W; Stille J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Mar; 36(3):220-37. PubMed ID: 1261788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Neonatal outcomes after instrumental vaginal delivery].
    Baud O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S260-8. PubMed ID: 19268202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Delivery with vacuum extraction--indications, technique and complications].
    Cetković N; Milasinović L; Nikolić L; Vuleta P; Radeka G; Jakovljević B
    Med Pregl; 1997; 50(3-4):108-11. PubMed ID: 9229680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.