These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12132757)

  • 1. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW; Heinke D; Cooper AC
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 12132757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The encoding process of nonconfigural information in contextual cuing.
    Ogawa H; Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18372753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.
    Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Wolfe JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18372752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search.
    von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ; Müller D
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jul; 14(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 12807402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1231-42. PubMed ID: 14710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search.
    Kristjánsson A
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jul; 11(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 11273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postattentive vision.
    Wolfe JM; Klempen N; Dahlen K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):693-716. PubMed ID: 10811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.
    Mounts JR; Melara RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention.
    Wolfe JM; Oliva A; Butcher SJ; Arsenio HC
    J Vis; 2002; 2(3):256-71. PubMed ID: 12678587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory.
    Peterson MS; Beck MR; Vomela M
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17515222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.
    Takeda Y; Yagi A
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):927-34. PubMed ID: 10997039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.
    Hulleman J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 19145020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 12075898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 18927031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus segmentation in the visual search task.
    Galera C; Lopes EJ; von Grünau M
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):505-16. PubMed ID: 10909241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.