These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12132846)

  • 1. Cementless S-ROM femoral component: effect of stem length on stability after extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Bhagia UT; Corpe RS; Steflik DE; Young TR; Schnars J
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2001; 10(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 12132846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the modular S-ROM prosthesis combined with corrective proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Onodera S; Majima T; Ito H; Matsuno T; Kishimoto T; Minami A
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Aug; 21(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 16877151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of a well-fixed cementless femoral component with an extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Younger TI; Bradford MS; Paprosky WG
    Contemp Orthop; 1995 May; 30(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 10150358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications.
    Mardones R; Gonzalez C; Cabanela ME; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15660064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem.
    Malhotra R; Dua A; Kiran EK; Bhan S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
    Barrack RL
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):98-100. PubMed ID: 12730940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal fixation for the extended trochanteric osteotomy: a pilot study comparing 3 cables vs 2 cables.
    Schwab JH; Camacho J; Kaufman K; Chen Q; Berry DJ; Trousdale RT
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jun; 23(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 18514870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended trochanteric osteotomy: planning, surgical technique, and pitfalls.
    Meek RM; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():119-30. PubMed ID: 15116606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy.
    Breusch SJ; Lukoschek M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Jun; 125(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 15742190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of extended trochanteric osteotomy and slot osteotomy for femoral component revision in total hip arthroplasty.
    Khanna G; Bourgeault CA; Kyle RF
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jun; 22(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 17350150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exposure for revision: total hip replacement.
    Glassman AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):39-47. PubMed ID: 15057077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intramedullary step-cut osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty with allograft-host bone size mismatch.
    Maclachlan CE; Ries MD
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 17689772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trochanteric osteotomies in revision total hip arthroplasty: contemporary techniques and results.
    Jando VT; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():143-55. PubMed ID: 15948441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal and axial stability of a cementless metaphyseal versus a fully porous coated cylindrical femoral stem.
    Rivera VR; Parks BG; Boucher HR
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19602338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior longitudinal split osteotomy for femoral component extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Bauze AJ; Charity J; Tsiridis E; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 18165035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Proximal and Distal Femoral Canal Geometry Influences Cementless Stem Anchorage and Revision Hip and Knee Implant Stability.
    Heinecke M; Rathje F; Layher F; Matziolis G
    Orthopedics; 2018 May; 41(3):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 29570762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty.
    MacDonald SJ; Cole C; Guerin J; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):210-6. PubMed ID: 14646719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.