BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12132939)

  • 1. PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions.
    Parker BC; Shiu AS; Maor MH; Lang FF; Liu HH; White RA; Antolak JA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 12132939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame.
    Das S; Isiah R; Rajesh B; Ravindran BP; Singh RR; Backianathan S; Subhashini J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 12(2):3260. PubMed ID: 21587166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
    Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional dosimetric evaluation of a conventional radiotherapy technique for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Choi PH; Cheung KY; Lee WY
    Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
    Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
    Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
    Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
    Song W; Dunscombe P
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of nonuniform CTV to PTV margin expansion incorporating both rotational and translational uncertainties.
    Miao J; Xu Y; Tian Y; Liu Z; Dai J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):78-86. PubMed ID: 31793203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
    Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
    Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiotherapy margin design with particular consideration of high curvature CTVs.
    Herschtal A; Kron T; Fox C
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):684-97. PubMed ID: 19378729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?
    Antolak JA; Rosen II
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1165-70. PubMed ID: 10421551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable planning margin approach to account for locoregional variations in setup uncertainties.
    Yang J; Garden AS; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Dong L
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5136-44. PubMed ID: 22894439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of random set-up errors in Monte Carlo calculated dynamic IMRT treatment plans.
    Stapleton S; Zavgorodni S; Popescu IA; Beckham WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 15773721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of patient set-up error and optimal treatment margin for intensity modulated radiotherapy using image guidance system.
    Kanakavelu N; Jebaseelan Samuel J
    J BUON; 2016; 21(2):505-11. PubMed ID: 27273965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
    Kumar S; Burke K; Nalder C; Jarrett P; Mubata C; A'hern R; Humphreys M; Bidmead M; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jan; 74(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15683670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.