These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12134209)

  • 41. [Clinical computer applications in the radiology department].
    Ando Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1999 Feb; 47(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 10097627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic image compression of output documentation of the most frequent examinations in nuclear medicine.
    Eising EG; Jentzen W; Görges R; Freudenberg L; Bockisch A
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):967-73. PubMed ID: 17659243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions.
    Müller H; Michoux N; Bandon D; Geissbuhler A
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Feb; 73(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 15036075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs.
    Erickson BJ; Manduca A; Persons KR; Earnest F; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 9268903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Web-based viewing of picture archiving and communications systems images--Part II: The effect of compression on speed of transmission.
    Bennett WF; Spigos DG; Tzalonikou MT; Terrell JE; Augustyn MA
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):116-8. PubMed ID: 10342185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.
    Baksi BG; Fidler A
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system's diagnostic workstations.
    Haynor DR; Smith DV; Park HW; Kim Y
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 May; 5(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 1623039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Radiologist-patient interactions: implications for picture archiving and communications systems and teleradiology.
    Williamson EE; Williamson B
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):137-8. PubMed ID: 10342192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. EEG compression using JPEG2000: how much loss is too much?
    Higgins G; Faul S; McEvoy RP; McGinley B; Glavin M; Marnane WP; Jones E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():614-7. PubMed ID: 21097193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding and controlling the effect of lossy raw data compression on CT images.
    Wang AS; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3643-53. PubMed ID: 19746798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image transmission and data compression. Two key elements of an electronic imaging department.
    J Health Care Technol; 1986; 3(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 10279815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Realization of DICOM medical image compression technology].
    Wang C; Wang Q; Ren H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 May; 37(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 24015609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors.
    Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Kim TJ; Mantiuk R; Kang HS; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W30-7. PubMed ID: 18647883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analysis of DICOM Image Compression Alternative Using Huffman Coding.
    Rahmat RF; Andreas TSM; Fahmi F; Pasha MF; Alzahrani MY; Budiarto R
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():5810540. PubMed ID: 31316743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Maximum likelihood difference scaling of image quality in compression-degraded images.
    Charrier C; Maloney LT; Cherifi H; Knoblauch K
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Nov; 24(11):3418-26. PubMed ID: 17975567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of two methods for retrieval of medical images in the compressed domain.
    Schaefer G; Starosolski R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():402-5. PubMed ID: 19162678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Near Lossless Compression for 3D Radiological Images Using Optimal Multilinear Singular Value Decomposition (3D-VOI-OMLSVD).
    Boopathiraja S; Kalavathi P; Deoghare S; Prasath VBS
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Feb; 36(1):259-275. PubMed ID: 36038701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluating the digital storage requirements for a partial picture archive and communication system.
    Battaglia G; Maroldi R; Chiesa A
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 Feb; 3(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2092806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Acceptable levels of digital image compression in chest radiology.
    Smith I; Roszkowski A; Slaughter R; Sterling D
    Australas Radiol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 10761257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality of compressed medical images.
    Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.