348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12134664)
1. [First clinical impressions of ProSeal laryngeal mask].
Murashima K; Yoshino H; Matsumoto T; Fukutome T
Masui; 2002 Jun; 51(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 12134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients].
Braun U; Zerbst M; Füllekrug B; Gentzel I; Hempel V; Leier M; Peters T; Hobbensiefken G; Klein U; Heuser D; Weyland A; Rey D; Weirich C; Krier C
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Dec; 37(12):727-33. PubMed ID: 12469285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.
Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.
Lopez-Gil M; Brimacombe J
Paediatr Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 15(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 15725321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures.
Zand F; Amini A; Sadeghi SE; Gureishi M; Chohedri A
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of pressure on cricoid on insertion ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and ventilation function].
Xue FS; Mao P; Li CW; Xu YC; Yang QY; Liu Y; Liu KP; Sun HT
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Sep; 19(9):532-5. PubMed ID: 17767821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies].
Borkowski A; Perl T; Heuer J; Timmermann A; Braun U
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2005 Aug; 40(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 16078158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Proseal laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized patients].
Ueno M; Suzuki A; Takahata O; Iwasaki H
Masui; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18807900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved esophageal patency when inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer.
El Beheiry H; Wong J; Nair G; Chinnappa V; Arora G; Morales E; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 56(10):725-32. PubMed ID: 19603240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X
Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.
Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD
Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients.
Kikuchi T; Kamiya Y; Ohtsuka T; Miki T; Goto T
Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18580172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals.
Cavus E; Deitmer W; Francksen H; Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Doerges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
