162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12134792)
1. Supreme Court. High Court says ADA's 'direct threat' includes threat to self.
AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Jul; 17(12):1, 4. PubMed ID: 12134792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court hears arguments in Echazabal 'direct threat' case.
AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Mar; 17(6):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12004754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High court asked to review another 'direct threat' case.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 13(16):11. PubMed ID: 11365735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bragdon vs Abbott: US Supreme Court set to re-examine HIV as a disability.
Zuniga J
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care; 1998 May; 4(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 11365189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supreme Court declines appeal of surgical technician.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Oct; 13(20):14. PubMed ID: 11366004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ADA in the courts.
Shepard G
GMHC Treat Issues; 1999; 13(5-6):11-3. PubMed ID: 11367135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HIV-infected surgical personnel under the ADA: do they pose a direct threat or are reasonable accommodations possible?
Rohlfsen RJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 16(1):127-46. PubMed ID: 10695248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical center not guilty of discrimination.
Stickler KB
Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):75-6. PubMed ID: 10170606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Employment discrimination--Americans with Disabilities Act--Ninth Circuit holds that the direct threat defense is not available when an employee poses a threat to his own health or safety--Echazabal v. Chevron USA, Inc., 226 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2000).
Heuvel DC
SMU Law Rev; 2001; 54(1):447-52. PubMed ID: 11962533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court to hear trio of ADA employment cases.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Feb; 14(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11366268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The law and HIV-/HBV-infected workers: protection or punishment?
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1992 Jun; 5(9):1-6. PubMed ID: 10171082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrimination. High Court turns down appeal in HIV direct threat case.
AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Jul; 17(12):5. PubMed ID: 12134796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court clarifies scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 10725047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court leaves intact ruling permitting AIDS caps.
AIDS Policy Law; 2000 Jan; 15(1):1,6. PubMed ID: 11367211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Knickel" and dime issues: an unexplored loophole in New York's genetic discrimination statute and the viability of genetic testing in the sports employment context.
Trumble PD
Albany Law Rev; 2007; 70(2):771-93. PubMed ID: 17486717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts reinterpret the direct threat defense.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Nov; 14(21):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 11367124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court decisions on benefits and employment law issues.
Meadors GM
J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 12235948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Case law on job accommodations.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(2):suppl 3-4. PubMed ID: 11365073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
Clegg R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
