These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12135210)
1. The creation of twin centile curves for size. Ong S; Lim MN; Fitzmaurice A; Campbell D; Smith AP; Smith N BJOG; 2002 Jul; 109(7):753-8. PubMed ID: 12135210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population. Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in fetal growth patterns between twins and singletons. Hiersch L; Okby R; Freeman H; Rosen H; Nevo O; Barrett J; Melamed N J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2546-2555. PubMed ID: 30501543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of second trimester biometry in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive techniques. Gardosi J; Mul T; Francis A; Hall J; Fishel S Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jun; 104(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 9197881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of intrauterine growth pattern of twins by linear discriminant analysis of the values of biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference1. Farina A; Vesce F; Garutti P; Jorizzo G; Bianciotto A Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1999; 48(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10394085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age. Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reference charts and equations of fetal biometry for normal singleton pregnant women in Shaanxi, China. Jiang X; Zhang YH; Li Y; Ma X; Zhu YS; Shang L Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 24283173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of customized fetal growth charts in twins. Ghi T; Prefumo F; Fichera A; Lanna M; Periti E; Persico N; Viora E; Rizzo G; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):514.e1-514.e17. PubMed ID: 28065816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155]. Créquat J; Duyme M; Brodaty G Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Jun; 28(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 10935308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference charts for fetal biometric parameters in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity. Araujo Júnior E; Ruano R; Javadian P; Martins WP; Elito J; Pires CR; Zanforlin Filho SM Prenat Diagn; 2014 Apr; 34(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 24395124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of birth order and presentation on intrauterine growth of twins. Blickstein I; Namir R; Weissman A; Diamant Y Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1993; 42(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 7976110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population. Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]