These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties. Lovitky JA J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: reporting practitioner malpractice and discipline. McNair RM Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):10-8. PubMed ID: 10284642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Participation in the National Practitioner Data Bank--Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1991 Oct; 56(208):55461-4. PubMed ID: 10115361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implications of the National Practitioner Data Bank for nurse practitioners. Birkholz G Nurse Pract; 1991 Aug; 16(8):40, 42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 1923009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals? Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians. Gagliano RD; Butler DL Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10114111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective physician credentialing. Properly monitoring medical staffs can protect hospitals from liability. Blaes SM; Knight GE Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):60-5. PubMed ID: 10107456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change? Scheutzow SO Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National practitioner data bank: information on physicians. West RW; Sipe CY J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):777-9. PubMed ID: 17411699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of National Practitioner Data Bank disclosure information for decision making. Oshel RE; Chen VT; Cohen RL; Lynch BS Qual Manag Health Care; 1997; 5(4):34-42. PubMed ID: 10169783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National Practitioner Data Bank: more guidelines, more problems. Snelson EA Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10126797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Practitioner Data Bank: implications for nurse anesthetists. Kremer M; Faut-Callahan M CRNA; 1998 Nov; 9(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 9866490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Court orders removal of report from National Practitioner Data Bank. Simpkins v. Shalala. Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Mar; 16(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10346624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The National Practitioner Data Bank: what CRNAs need to know. Jordan LM; Quraishi JA; Liao J AANA J; 2013 Apr; 81(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23971227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case law update: corporate negligence, peer review information, medical malpractice, Good Samaritan statute, emergency medicine. West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 2009; 29(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 19774972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank: clinical privileges action reports. Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Oshel RE; Fordyce MA; Cohen R; Rosenblatt RA JAMA; 1999 Jul; 282(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 10432032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]