These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12136299)

  • 1. Movement mapping as dynamic preoperative surgical planning in total hip replacement. A precondition to navigation?
    Jerosch J; Weipert A; Hanusek S; Schneppenheim M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jul; 122(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 12136299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
    Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty.
    Ji WT; Tao K; Wang CT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
    Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.
    Incavo SJ; Thompson MT; Gold JE; Patel RV; Icenogle KD; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20378308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
    Amuwa C; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation.
    Ko BH; Yoon YS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 18550233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Hube R; Birke A; Hein W; Klima S
    Surg Technol Int; 2003; 11():275-80. PubMed ID: 12931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination?
    Schwarz ML; Pott PP; Beck A; Heute S; Scharf HP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16199382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements].
    Kliewe C; Souffrant R; Kluess D; Woernle C; Brökel K; Bader R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb; 55(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20128745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.