608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12136361)
1. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].
Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Pitton M; Requardt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
Wright VL; Olan W; Dick B; Yu H; Alberts-Grill N; Latour LL; Baird AE
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Giannatempo GM; Marano R; De Matthaeis P; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
J Neuroradiol; 1999 Jun; 26(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 10444932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.
U-King-Im JM; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Hollingworth W; Graves M; Joubert I; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Stroke; 2004 Sep; 35(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 15243149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography].
Barbier C; Lefèvre F; Bui P; Denny P; Aiouaz C; Becker S
J Radiol; 2001 Mar; 82(3 Pt 1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11287855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
